The plan originally was ideally to let Calvinists write for Calvinism, and non-Calvinists write against Calvinism. So far, no writer for Calvinism on this site has been found. Therefore, most material here refutes Calvinism.
Calvinism ExaminedArguments, both for & against Calvinism, examinedDietrich Bonhoeffer said ...
In conversation with him, one virtually feels that one is dealing not at all with a person, but with slogans, catchwords and the like that have taken possession of him. 1
What Bonhoeffer seems to be saying is that something is missing - namely, thinking. Calvinism should be considered with thought - prove all things, the Bible exhorts us, Bereans searched the scriptures, etc..
Optimizing a thing that should not exist, is possibly the number one engineering mistake of a smart engineer, per Elon Musk. https://youtu.be/t705r8ICkRw?t=1047
Reifying labels is along similar lines. They should not - rather, do not - exist as the things they represent, but too often they can be treated or described ("optimized") as though they do exist.