Sovereignty examined
Claim
Requiring meticulous determinism for God is characteristic of a less sovereign God than one who allows free will choice.
- Read more about Sovereignty examined
- Log in to post comments
The plan originally was ideally to let Calvinists write for Calvinism, and non-Calvinists write against Calvinism. So far, no writer to write in favor of Calvinism on this site has been found. Therefore, most material here refutes Calvinism.
Requiring meticulous determinism for God is characteristic of a less sovereign God than one who allows free will choice.
Calvinism, in spite of possible other problems, is at least internally logically consistent.
The argument for Irresistible Grace, that when rejecting Salvation, man is stronger than God, is not valid.
The video below depicts Calvinism accurately.
The negative impact of Calvinism is examined by Leighton Flowers.
Calvinism relies on a double standard with respect to language looseness.
The key issue of Calvinism is not whether God is fair, or whether man has free will, etc. - but whether God's word is true.
A statement by Martyn Lloyd-Jones on Calvinism is analyzed and found to involve non epistemic ranking criteria.
If cognition follows correct process, Calvinism will not result.